Makes total sense for them. I wish they had compared to H.265/HEVC too, but I guess they didn't consider it anyway because it's cheaper to use their free codecs instead.
I'm curious what Twitch uses to do transcoding and recompress for archival versions.. 🤔
Nice write up. Just this bothers me a bit.
"Google achieves a 7x increase in total cost of ownership (TCO) for the infrastructure needed to encode videos on H.264, and a 33.3x increase in VP9."
That's TCO reduction not increase. :-)
Cool stuff. I wrote some of my thoughts on it here:
https://www.libertyrpf.com/p/126-constellation-software-annual#:~:text=Argos%20Video
Makes total sense for them. I wish they had compared to H.265/HEVC too, but I guess they didn't consider it anyway because it's cheaper to use their free codecs instead.
I'm curious what Twitch uses to do transcoding and recompress for archival versions.. 🤔